Blog post

2018 Ford EcoSport 2.0L AWD

Taco Winter

If the Ford EcoSport were a car, it would be a very small one. A tad shorter in length than a Honda Fit and barely longer than Ford’s own Fiesta hatchback, the thirteen-and-a-half-foot-long EcoSport soon will be FoMoCo’s littlest and likely its least expensive vehicle sold in the United States, once the company’s plan to kill off all its passenger-car nameplates runs its course.

View the EcoSport through the lens of its market segment, though—the subcompact-SUV segment that includes rivals such as the Jeep Renegade, the Mazda CX-3, and the Honda HR-V—and the Ford starts to look positively Lilliputian. Bumper to bumper, it’s some five inches shorter than the Jeep, seven inches littler than the Mazda, and almost eight inches stubbier than the Honda.

EcoSport without EcoBoost

With that tiny of a shadow, the EcoSport is the smallest U.S.-market vehicle we can think of that can be had with all-wheel drive, the feature that many SUV shoppers consider a must-have. The EcoSport tested here was so equipped, which means it also comes with an engine that’s double the displacement of the one found in its front-wheel-drive stablemate. Checking the box for AWD costs around $1500, depending on trim level (except on the SES where it’s standard), and it necessitates a switch from the turbocharged 1.0-liter EcoBoost inline-three to a naturally aspirated 2.0-liter inline-four, which makes 166 horsepower and 149 lb-ft of torque.

Despite its diminutive size, the EcoSport 2.0L AWD weighed in at a hefty 3386 pounds, 240 more than the front-wheel-drive EcoSport (and about 300 pounds more than equivalent CX-3s and HR-Vs we’ve tested). That meant its extra 43 horsepower and 24 lb-ft of torque couldn’t register much of an improvement over the 1.0-liter car’s painfully slow 10.4-second run to 60 mph. The 2.0-liter EcoSport was 0.6 second quicker to 60 and also took an interminable 17.5 seconds to run the quarter-mile (0.4 second quicker than the 1.0-liter).

As you’d expect from something so tall and narrow, the EcoSport has a somewhat tippy feel when you push it hard in corners. There’s no reason for significant concern in the era of stability control, of course, but the EcoSport’s handling and braking numbers of 0.79 g of grip on the skidpad and 182 feet to stop from 70 mph are near the back of the pack, and the steering feels overboosted and vague. The ride is smooth enough on good pavement, but large bumps and uneven surfaces send reverberations through the cabin, cheapening the driving experience.

Bigger Is Better

Surprisingly, the AWD EcoSport’s extra cylinder, larger engine, and additional drive wheels didn’t have a negative impact on fuel economy. Quite the opposite, actually, as the smaller engine needs to work harder—the 2.0-liter version bettered the 1.0-liter car by 2 mpg in our highway fuel-economy test, hitting 30 mpg, although that’s still disappointing for a vehicle of this size. Away from our highway loop and our test track, we achieved 24 mpg overall. Not that the 2.0-liter provides effortless power, however, as it strains to get the EcoSport up to highway speeds. At least the six-speed automatic serves up unobtrusive shifts and generally chooses the correct gear.

Ford does get a fair number of things right inside the EcoSport. Although the cabin feels narrow, particularly in the rear seat, our SES test car was nicely trimmed (by the low standards of its competitive set). The tablet-style center touchscreen is easily reached and simple to use, with Ford’s Sync 3 infotainment system responding quickly to inputs and offering good smartphone connectivity. Dashboard materials are well chosen, the climate controls are clearly marked, and things such as the USB ports are readily accessible. We’re not quite sold on the loud orange accents that come standard on the SES, but they do jazz things up a bit.

Prev Post Next Post